sandeyeDifferent Styles: Aspars(h)a & Abhava Yoga
August 21st 2008 16:22
Although listed in several places as separate Yogic practice styles, there is very little information about either Aspars(h)a or Abhava Yoga online, and absolutely none at the local library. Neither are recognized by my dictionary. They appear to be theoretical and based on text rather than everyday Asana & Pranayama practices. I have not been able to research them extensively, and therefore can only list them in one paragraph summaries, rather than full descriptions at this time. Hopefully, after further research efforts, I shall be able to offer further information.
ASPARS(H)A YOGA apparently stems from Gaudapada's Mandukya-Karika. It refers to a nondualist Yogic practice based upon noncontact. I can find no information as to whether this practice goes beyond theory, or which aspects of Yoga practice are utilized - ie Asana/meditation/etc.
ABHAVA YOGA stems from the Puranas (Ancient Indian texts) and the definition is 'unsupported power'. It refers to lack of support from mantras or hymns in a mental discipline, rather than modern Asana props such as belts and blocks. The theory is based on self concentration, focusing on nonbeing and immersion into the self. Abhava Yoga is the first stage of four, the last being Agni Yoga, which I have referred to in a former posting.
ASPARS(H)A YOGA apparently stems from Gaudapada's Mandukya-Karika. It refers to a nondualist Yogic practice based upon noncontact. I can find no information as to whether this practice goes beyond theory, or which aspects of Yoga practice are utilized - ie Asana/meditation/etc.
ABHAVA YOGA stems from the Puranas (Ancient Indian texts) and the definition is 'unsupported power'. It refers to lack of support from mantras or hymns in a mental discipline, rather than modern Asana props such as belts and blocks. The theory is based on self concentration, focusing on nonbeing and immersion into the self. Abhava Yoga is the first stage of four, the last being Agni Yoga, which I have referred to in a former posting.
| 33 |
| Vote |
Shared on
Subscribe to this blog
